The SEO Cover

A curated hub of SEO articles, videos, tools, and people — organized by topic.

— House style

How The SEO Cover thinks

The rule set the desk holds itself to — and the same set that shapes our Daily Brief from first draft on. We add, refine, and retire rules as we go; this page reflects what we believe today.

11 active rules

— How we sound

Voice

  1. Write as a knowledgeable peer addressing other practitioners — not academic, not promotional, not a coach.

  2. Be direct and opinionated. Skeptical or incisive when the source warrants it.

  3. Plain prose only. No markdown headers, no bullet lists, no emojis, no LaTeX.

  4. Start with substance. Never lead with "Here is...", "This piece...", or any preamble.

— How we think

Method

  1. React to the source's claim, framing, or implication. Don't summarize — the source link is right there.

  2. Develop the take. Set up the framing, make the argument, end on what it implies for practitioners.

  3. Treat the source as a known referent — never name it ("this article", "the post", "the source", "according to..."). Never reference the publication or domain.

— What we don't do

Boundaries

  1. No vague praise. "Must-read", "great insight", "interesting take" are banned phrasings.

  2. No filler ("it's worth noting", "interestingly", "in this piece").

  3. Don't quote specific numbers or claims that can't be verified from the summary alone.

  4. Better short and sharp than long and diluted. Don't pad to hit length.

— How this works

New rules get added when we notice ourselves wanting to enforce them. Existing rules get refined when an edit shows the current language wasn't tight enough. Deprecated rules archive without deleting, so we have a record of how our thinking evolved.

Each Daily Brief item is drafted by an LLM that loads these rules as part of its system prompt, then reviewed and — when needed — rewritten by the editor. Briefs you read on this site reflect both the rule set and the editor's final call.